With all apologies to Frank Zappa.
The big deal in online Atheism of late is the issue of sexual harassment at various atheist cons and the emerging idea of Atheism+ or A+.
It all got started with this post by Jen/Blag-Hag:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2012/08/how-i-unwittingly-infiltrated-the-boys-club-why-its-time-for-a-new-wave-of-atheism/
Fellow Game Designer and Atheist Jeff Dee sums it up from how he sees it on his blog:
http://wwjdee.blogspot.com/2012/07/sexual-harassment-amongst-unbelievers.html
Here is the issue I have with Atheism+. I am not sure how it is different than what I am already doing.
I have never been a "super activist" but I have always taken a stand on what I thought was right against those in power (or otherwise). Most recently my activism was mostly on raising awareness on various cliches portrayed in the media and advocating same-sex marriage. For me all of this and my atheism come from the same place. It is all about the same thing; "People are more important than imaginary gods".
Why then am I not a Secular Humanist? I suppose I am, but for me, right now, my atheism comes first.
But it seems, painfully, that I am a rare minority, or at least part of a very silent majority.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2012/08/24/mencallmethings-fuckin-hoe-fuckin-feminazi-slut/
A non-sexual-harassment reasoning to support A+
http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/08/threatening-others-cannot-be-tolerated.html
Lots of reactions linked and listed here:
http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/08/reactions-to-atheism.html
I will continue to monitor this, but I am not likely to change what I have been doing all these years. I guess I was just ahead of the curve.
Well. I am not an atheist, neither I am an attorney on sexual harassment and I am a little confused of what you were trying to point out. However, I must say that I know a little thing that is why I can't see the relationship about this issue on harassment with being an atheist. Your article still makes good sense.
ReplyDelete